Category Archives: Let’s Talk About…

Walking Simulators: Should You bother Playing Them?

One of the newest video gaming genres is the walking simulator. It is exactly as it sounds: You just walk all over the game’s world clicking on things or going to a certain place and a cutscene starts. It’s basically a movie that you have to work to get the story. Yes, the gameplay is basically non-existent, which means the majority of gamers will just avoid them like plagues.

So, what caused me to talk about walking sims? I finally played one: The Town of Light.

You see, what made me buy this game (it was only $10, don’t worry) was the plot: a woman with a mental disorder returns to the closed down mental hospital she was committed to in order to remember what really happened to her and her friend. It’s also based on an actual Italian mental hospital and events that happened there.

Right off the bat, you can tell the storytelling is going to be her narrating everything. This could work if done right and it was done OK in this game. Yes, the things that happened to her were messed up, but how much of it really happened. Not to mention that despite the game having multiple story routes, the ending is the same and it is pretty messed up.

The only way I can think of that walking sims can actually be remembered is with strong storytelling. That’s basically all that these games can offer. If the story sucks, why bother? There are plenty of games that have great stories that have even spawned comics, novels, animated series and tons of merchandise.

Of course, gamers avoid these games because, well, are they really games? Technically speaking, yes. You need a human to control a character in a computer-generated world in order for something to happen. However, the lack of anything that can be considered gameplay is nonexistent.

Of course, the odd person will defend them saying how come people bash walking sims and not visual novels? Simple: visual novels usually have some type of gameplay element. Hell, Phoenix Wright has collecting evidence and then the trial part, Danganronpa has, well, the same thing but a lot more complicated and the first Corpse Party has you collecting items and running away from ghosts, a maniac and in one part a child molester. Same thing with point and click games: you collected items that you need in order to solve puzzles and then question the developer’s sanity when you find a puzzle that requires you put an octopus in a toilet, use prunes on this one guy which causes him to run to said toilet where he gets raped by the octopus and you getting his belt buckle. If you think I’m making this up, go play Discworld for the PC and PS1.

So, should you play a walking sim? If you just want a story where you control a character and you have to work in it by walking around a computer-generated world, then yes. If you want to play a game, look somewhere else. Do walking sims have a place in gaming? Absolutely! You’d be surprised what has fans nowadays and these developers have found that (small) audience.


Filed under Let's Talk About..., Video Games

Let’s Talk About The Baby-sitters Club

Yes, you read that right. I’m a guy who was curious about the Baby-sitters Club books. Yes, I’m comfortable with my sexuality. I did it out of purely academic interest. I mean, they’re there to be read, right?

Anyway, I only read the first book Kristy’sGreat Idea. That was more than enough for me to give an honest view.

Basically, the first book is about four friends who create a club for babysitters (thus the title) and they babysit a whole bunch. That’s really it.

Yes, I’m aware there have been a lot more books written n the series (my sister had a whole bunch when she was a teenager but gave all the books away.) I’m a guy and know that 1. This series was not meant for me and 2. I can see the appeal of these books.

You see, every form of media has that one (or 100) series that really talks to people. For teenage girls, this is one of them because, even today, many girls make money babysitting. Based on this first book the babysitting stories are similar to what happened to the reader when they babysit. One thing of note is that, though a bit outdated, kids really are like this. There are good kids and then there are holy terrors. Babysitters have babysat all of these. Thus, female readers see themselves in these four girls’ shoes.

As mentioned above, the first book is a bit outdated. Since this was written in the 80s some things (like the old fashioned corded phone) will be alien to girls from this generation on. Girls will still read them because, besides the things mentioned above, the writing has not aged. There is no slang, regional sayings or even mentions of items from that time. This is another strength this series has and why some girls still read it.

Of course, these books aren’t masterpieces and aren’t as popular as they were in the 80s and 90s, but they can still be enjoyed. Think of it like this: boys have Goosebumps and girls and The Baby-sitters club. Though I am against this whole gender appropriate crap (I like Sailor Moon. Don’t say anything) this is one of those times where boys will not like what they’re reading.

Even though I’m, not the right audience, I can still see how and why this series got so popular and still read today. Though the popularity died down, girls can still read these books, enjoy them and identify with them. Just don’t expect anything too profound, though.

Leave a comment

Filed under Let's Talk About...

Let’s Talk About The Killing Joke

I have no shame in stuff like this.

As many of you have hear, there is an animated version of The Killing Joke coming out this September. It’s about now a good time for me to talk about it. I remember reading this comic a few years ago and being underwhelmed by it. Yes, I did not like it when I read it a few years ago. With the movie announcement I, decided to give this comic a second chance. After reading it, I have a new found respect for it.

For those who don’t know, The Killing Joke is a Batman comic written by famed comic book writer Alan Moore. It’s about The Joker escaping Arkham Asylum and Batman is looking for him. Along the way, The Joker buys an abandoned amusement park, shoots Barbera Gordon and kidnaps Commissioner Gordon.

Only Alan Moore can make this plot work. You see, something like this needs that special kind of fucked up, and who better than a guy who looks like this to write it. That special kind of fucked up includes shooting, paralyzing and taking nude pictures of Barbera Gordon and an entire song about the joys of being crazy. The joy of reading this is is that it is not the typical Batman story. It’s more like a trip into someone’s messed up mind.

Ehn I first read it, I thought the ending was lame. Now that I have re-read it, it’s brilliant in a way. I can’t say what happens because it will be a spoiler, but if you pay attention you’ll understand why. It’s also open-ended, which sometimes sucks but this time, it’s pretty awesome. That is until DC fixed all that.

Speaking of DC fixing stuff, DC is now retconning Barbera being paralyzed. That is really, really stupid in my opinion. Also, one of the biggest reasons this comic had such an impact of Batman is because of Barbera getting paralyzed. That’s it. Not about The Joker finally having something resembling a background, not what happens in the ending. NO! Barbera getting paralyzed is a big deal.

The art is done by Brian Bolland. As with the story, the art is one of the reasons this comic has stood the test of time. The best parts are that whenever something is supposed to be demented, it looks demented. Just look at the most famous panel. That alone is iconic.

Will I be seeing the movie? Of course. The thing is, it is possible to mess this up because some of the imagery and scenes may be watered down. Also, Alan Moore REALLY hates every adaptation of his work.

With that, read The Killing Joke before the movie comes out. It has a great story, fucked up everything and great art. If the movie sucks, go to Alan Moore and tell him that you’re going to boycott any further adaptations of his works. He’ll probably thank you.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Let's Talk About...

Let’s Talk About The Epic of Gilgamesh.

If there’s one type of story all English majors, classical studies majors and Brooklyn College students must be subjected to it’s the epic poem. Of course, the ones all these schools force upon its students are The Iliad, The Odyssey and the Aeneid. We all know these stories because of something to do with the shaped Western history or something like that.

There is one that is equally important but is rarely taught in American schools is The Epic of Gilgamesh. Well, that’s why I’m here. Of course, what I’m about to say is just a layman’s interpretation of this epic.

First off, just like the Greek/Roman epics this was written down on tablets. The only difference is the Greek/Roman epics were performed by a ton of people, written down and passed on and rediscovered by a bunch of Renaissance Europeans in their entirety. Gilgamesh wasn’t so lucky. While archeologists found 11 tablets, most of them were in poor shape and most of the epic is missing. Although there were some tablets recently discovered, it’s still incomplete. That’s why it’s only about 70 pages long while the Greek/Roman ones are about 600.

Of course, the real reason people care about this epic poem is because it talks about a flood. Some people say that this is proof that there was a flood and that this was the inspiration for Noah’s Arc (or Noah’s Arc was the inspiration depending on who you ask.) That’s it really.

For those who don’t care about this flood business and want a reason to read it, that reason is because it’s entertaining. I don’t mean in a literary or high art sense, I mean in a superhero comic book sense. Yes, COMIC BOOK! You see, the plot is basically Gilgamesh gets into a fight with a wild man named Enkidu and then become friends. They then kill a bunch of mythical creatures,  Enkidu dies, Gilgamesh becomes sad and then dies. That’s it. There’s more to this story (Gilgamesh just dies after the flood story.) That’s a comic book story if ever there was one. It would be better if it was complete.

Of course, it does have the same repetition that all epics have. Remember, this was meant to be performed, not read. Reading certain parts does seem weird, though.

With that, read The Epic of Gilgamesh. It’s entertaining and important despite being incomplete. If more of the story comes to light, that would be a great victory for archeology and to literature.

Leave a comment

Filed under Let's Talk About...

Let’s Talk About Why We Love Diary of a Wimpy Kid

Book ten of the bestselling young adult series Diary of a Wimpy Kid has been out for a while. And yours truly is a fan. (Don’t judge.) After finishing the tenth book, I got to thinking: Why has this series lasted so long and why does every book have so many holds on it at the library?

First, for those who don’t know, the story is about a middle school boy named Greg Heffley and his everyday life. His everyday life is filled with things that would annoy any teenager. The books are written in the first person since they are supposed to be Greg’s journal entries (thus the title.)

Let’s get the obvious out of the way: Yes, some of the situations do come across as something you’d see in a bad Disney Channel/Nickelodeon sitcom. Though not as bad as those, these situations are a bit, lack of a better word, stupid. For example. in the ninth book Hard Luck, Greg uses a magic 8-ball to cheat on a test. His teacher catches him, takes him to the principal and calls it an “electronic cheating device.” Why is that stupid? Because, yes, the teacher may be old and doesn’t know about the latest technology, but the magic 8-ball first came out in NINETEEN FUCKING FIFTY! That teacher would have HAD a magic 8-ball when she was a kid. That scene made NO SENSE!

Now that I vented, let’s look at the positives. You see, many kids see themselves as Gregg because he pretty much is a modern day kid. He doesn’t act like what an adult thinks a kid is like, he acts like a kid. He likes video games, hates school, wants to just watch TV all day and loves summer because there is no school. On top of that, the things that do get him in trouble real life kids have done. Crashing your dad’s car, losing your kid brother, hiding stuff from your parents. These are all things kids have done.

Not to mention all think they have Greg’s family. Yes, they are pretty much cliches, but they feel realer than anything in this genre. There’s the overprotective mom who’s lie that because of Greg’s little brother; Greg’s brother Roderick acts like a lazy older teen who’s in a band and does some mean things to Greg, but he’s not over the top. He acts like what an older brother does act like towards his younger brother.

Another trope is the dorky friend with the super strict parents (Milhouse, Butters.) In this case, it’s Rowley. Rowley may be a trope, but he does have some redeeming qualities that make him an actual character instead of a trope.

And that’s why these books are entertaining. These characters are your typical young adult tropes, but they don’t act like them. Not to mention the plots and situations are more relatable and realistic than your typical young adult story (with some exemptions of course.)

So, does this series deserve the fame it has? In a way, yes it does.  It’s certainly better than many other series aimed at 10-14- year olds. It has the right amount of relatability to keep it interesting and knows when not to be stupid so that even adults can enjoy.



Leave a comment

Filed under Let's Talk About...

Let’s Talk About Peer Reviews

Part of being in the arts is that your stuff will get reviewed. There is no way around this fact. There will be people who love your work, downright hate it or give an overwhelming “meh.” Or, as some people a little too sensitive about their work would say “haters” and “fans.” But then there’s the other type of people. These are your fellow writers/artists. The term for these people are “peers” or “contemporaries.”

That’s where things get a bit complicated. You see, this is where you can’t they’re “haters” or “jealous” or anything like that. These are people doing the same exact thing as you are. They HAVE done what you’ve done and will continue to do that. So, do you take advice from your peers or do you shun them? The obvious answer is to listen to them.

Now, I’m fully aware that there are hacks out there. But you have to admit that they are doing something to make money in their field. You can take this as a sort of taking advice and doing what they told you a million times better. Take that statement as a way of saying the student surpassing the teacher.

Has this type of thing caused any kind of rivalries? Of course! One of the best that comes to mind is between F. Scot Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway. You see, Fitzgerald and Hemingway were at one time best of buddies. Once The Sun Also Rises was published, however, they had a major falling out.  There’s even an entire book that talks about this. Hell, I remember Brooklyn College offered an ENTIRE COURSE on these two. (Yes, I took it and got a B, thank you very much.) Hell, there’s an entire chart showing which writers hated which.

Why is that? Competition? Mudslinging? Or is it just each person giving their own opinions. I’d pick all of them. Yes, ALL OF THEM! You see, we as a species enjoy competition. Why do you think sports have been around for so long? Hell, why do you think there are video game tournaments? Us artists/writers are no different. We see one of our own publish something so, as a way of what today is called “supporting a fellow writer/artist” we by their stuff. And we form some strong opinions about it. One of my favorite reviews is of Salmon Rushdie saying about 50 Shades of Grey, “I’ve never read anything so badly written that got published. It made Twilight look like War and Peace.” That right there is saying a lot.

Some people look at reviews by novelists and ask why. I say why not? We’re readers, too. We enjoy a good book as much as the next literate person. We also have a right to call a peer’s stuff garbage. We also have a right to praise the ever  living crap out of another’s work.

And that’s a good thing.

We as artists/writers thrive on the opinions of people in our industry. It’s one of the things that drive us to do what we do and love. We may not like some of the stuff that’s being said, but to many of us that’s fine as long as we don’t have to share a table at conventions or (god forbid) have talks on the same day. This is MY audience. Back, you scurvy dog.

For those asking, “why how did this idea come about?” It came about when reading the analysis Sei Hatsuno gave to Another. He started by saying, ” it is difficult for novelists to critique novels objectively,” and he is absolutely right. Novels are meant to give the reader a certain type of emotion(s). That’s how every review of everything comes from. We can add in some critical analysis to our reviews, but the sad truth is most of what is said comes from our emotions.

So, my fellow artists/writers, don’t be afraid to let out what you really feel about a peer. You may make an enemy or a very powerful ally. It’s our fuel and it’s how we make what we create better by one-upping each other. And that, my friends, is a win-win for the general public. It also keeps the tabloids in business.

Leave a comment

Filed under Let's Talk About...

Let’s Talk About Terry Pratchett’s Later Novels.

As I said in my Eulogy to Sir. Terry Pratchett I am a huge fan of his. To me his best books are the Discworld books with their various characters that are so different, realistic and charming. Not to mention funny in a way normal humans can be funny.

However, I have run into a slight problem in recent years with his books. You see, his last few books have been mediocre at best and the humor is not there. Don’t get the wrong idea, Sir. Terry was a great writer with a ton of imagination and humor. The problem is that imagination seems to have been suppressed in his final year.

It all started with Wintersmith. Tiffany Aching is one the best YA characters to date because she does not fit into any mold. Wintersmith came along and she slowly started going into that mold. The sequel, I Shall Wear Midnight was less inspired than Wintersmith. In fact I don’t remember anything that happened in those books.

Actually, I don’t remember anything that happened in those books, Nation, Dodger, Snuff, The Long Earth and recently Raising Steam. The sad part is I’m currently reading Raising Steam. If you asked me what happened in The Color of Magic I’d tell you. Reaper Man? yup, because that book rocked. Hell, even Pyramids which is one of the weaker Discworld books.

Hell, I can tell you exactly what happened in the Johnny Maxwell Trilogy and the Bromeliad Trilogy.

There may be a few reasons for this. One can be Pratchett fans expected a lot from him seeing how great his older books are. Exactly how hard did you laugh when Rincewind returned to Ankh-Morpork and started running around like a psycho? Hell, he even swallowed a bunch of Dibbler’s sausages and lived. I remember reading that scene in my college library and everyone looked at me weird because I was laughing so hard.

I hate to even bring it up, but another reason could have been his Alzheimer’s. I know Alzheimer’s is nothing to take lightly, but it does interfere with a lot of things. It’s amazing he did manage to write books with that disease. Unfortunately, it may have been a factor in the low quality of his last books. He may have had a lot on his mind and writing may have turned into a chore for him.

Don’t get mad at me, that could have been a possibility and I do respect the man for fighting through Alzheimer’s and pleasing his fans. I understand having Alzheimer’s is a struggle people have to deal with every day. I’m just theorizing that that may have played a part in it.

Now the sad part is that there will no longer be any more Discworld books. There is one more Discworld book called The Shepherd’s Crown, although how far it was before he died is a mystery. Of course, his daughter Rhianna has said she would continue to write Discworld books is a great thing. The problem lies in the fact that she may not be able to bring forth the essence of what Discworld is, though that does remain to be seen.

Sir. Terry Pratchett may have been a great novelist, but his last few books were not up to snuff. Whatever the reason for that shall remain a mystery. For now, I will try to re-read these books and maybe find something of value in them like I did with his older books. I will give my opinions on Rhianna Pratchett’s crack at the Discworld when they come out.

Leave a comment

Filed under Let's Talk About...

Let’s Talk About Reading War and Peace

War and Peace is considered one of the greatest pieces of fiction that came out of the 19th century. It is also one the longest pieces of literature that came out of the 19th century. There have been a ton of jokes about War and Peace’s length, especially from Charles Schulz in his Peanuts comic. Who can forget Snoopy saying he’s only on the first page for a week and Charlie Brown carrying the book on a wagon because it weighs a ton.

That’s one of the biggest reasons people have with reading War and Peace: It’s insanely long. Of course, lots of books people love are long. Look at the last three Harry Potter book, the Lord of the Rings and almost every single scifi and fantasy book. People love and read this books all the time. Another reason could be it’s a 19th century book. That can’t be right because look at how many started reading Pride and Prejudice and Wuthering Heights because of (I can’t believe I’m saying this) Twilight. I think I need another drink for saying that.

There has to be another reason, right? After reading 200 pages over the course of six years (yes) I can safely say one reason is the writing. Don’t get me wrong, the writing isn’t bad at all. It’s just that it is really dry with long stretches of people sitting around talking about politics. You see, a lot of the dialogue is foreign to us 21th century folk. The politics of the time is lost to many of us. We do know about Napoleon, but the small details are lost to many of us.

Then there’s the random French and Latin. The first 100 pages of the book is full of it. The problem here is that, unless you’re an avid 19th century literature reader or an English lit major (same thing) this is like driving down the road and then hitting a brick wall that came out of nowhere.

Then there’s the fact that there are a ton of characters. The beginning of many editions show a list of every character and who they are. While normal in the 19th century, modern readers will forgot a lot of these characters characters, especially since they all have Russian names. Of course, you can train yourself to do that, but many people don’t bother.

It’s because of these reasons people generally give up on the book (like I did years ago and started the book up again just recently) and don’t look back. Then there are rabid fans of the book who will defend it as a masterpiece. I knew a college professor who read the book FOUR TIMES! That’s dedication right there.

War and Peace may be a classic and a masterpiece, but many people will give up on it or refuse to read it for one or multiple reasons stated above. Of course, there is one great way to read this and any book: form a reading group. Yes, this works wonders. Not only can you read the book but you and a bunch of people will read it along with you and exchange ideas. This is probably the best way to read these long, hard books. I know I’m not giving up on the book. I’ll finish it even if it kills.

Finishing a book before it kills me? Reminds of another book I just can’t force myself to finish for multiple reasons…

Leave a comment

Filed under Let's Talk About...

Let’s Talk About A Christmas Carol

“And so, as Tiny Tim observed, God Bless Us, Every One!”

And with that one line, a classic was born. Not mention the modern notion of Christmas. You see, Christmas was pretty different before this book came out. Hell, the US downright banned anyone celebrating it due to it being mostly a drunken wild party.

As pointed out by The Victorian Web Dickens was “the man who invented Christmas.” Practically everything we associate with the “spirit of Christmas” comes from him. Santa Clause and buying lavish presents is thanks to Coke, Macy’s and Corporate America. It’s because of Hollywood that there are dozens of adaptations of the book.

Why so many adaptations of one book besides the usual money and it being the typical Christmas movie?

The biggest reason can be because the themes of the book ring true to what Christmas stands for. Some people think greed is one theme but, according to the introduction in the Barnes and Nobles Classic edition that comes with The Chimes and The Cricket on the Hearth, Dickens cared little for money. Yes, he was born dirt poor but that was “normal” in his time. He was more concerned with generosity. He didn’t care that you were rich as long as you did the Christian did and gave alms.

Another theme is redemption. Scrooge starts off as an uncaring miser who hates Christmas and treated the poor like dirt to a caring and giving person. At the end he understood that, yes, he’s well off but, as Marley said, “Mankind was my business. The common welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, benevolence, were all my business.” This is something the common man understands and many wealthy people don’t. This comes back to the whole charity thing mentioned above.

There’s also that famous scene with the Cratchit family. They have very little but are happy. What Dickens is saying is that the poor may not have a lot, but they do have each other and lots of faith.

Put all these themes together and you get what many people consider to be what Christmas is all about.

There are other literary factors to it, too. Mainly the story is very well written. Dickens manages to make every scene memorable and alive, almost as if you’re there yourself. Then there’s the characters. The characters are some of the most memorable characters in literature. They all feel like real people in various different points in life. We all know a Bob Cratchit, a Scrooge and a Fezziwig.

I have a tradition of reading this book every year in December and seeing at least four different adaptations. This has gone on for seven years now. Obsessed maybe, but it’s not as far fetched as watching A Christmas Story marathon every year on Christmas Day. This book and its adaptations have become a tradition around Christmas. It is one of the few escapes from the crazy shoppers at the stores around this time.

If you haven’t read this book yet, give it a shot. It’s only about 80-100 pages depending on the edition and is a quick read despite being written in the 19th century. Also check out some good adaptations of it like Mickey’s Christmas Carol, Muppet Christmas Carol or even Scrooged with Bill Murray.



Leave a comment

Filed under Let's Talk About...

Let’s Talk About Thanksgiving Fiction

If there’s one thing that we have a total lack of it’s any type of fiction about Thanksgiving. Oh, there’s plenty of stuff on the first Thanksgiving and plenty of shows that take place on Thanksgiving (with plenty of “hilarity”) but not about Thanksgiving.

The reason for the only form of Thanksgiving being hilarity at the dinner table is because, unlike Christmas or Halloween, this is based on an historical event. Not to mention very little is known about the first thanksgiving. Don’t get me wrong, there’s a ton of historical fiction out there with varying degrees of quality. It’s just that the first Thanksgiving is about as interesting as watching paint dry.

Yes, I said it. That story may be about finding a new way of life in a new world, but the details are just so boring and reek of something you hear from a droning history teacher. I just answered my own question, huh?

That doesn’t mean there aren’t any good Thanksgiving stories out there. Look at A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving. It’s been aired on TV since 1973 because not only is it Peanuts but IT’S FUNNY AS HELL AND WELL WRITTEN! Yes, Nostalgia Critic, Peanuts cartoons are well written. That is why so many people watch this special every year without fail. And guess what? It gets better every single time you see it and no it’s not because of all that turkey in your stomach.

The only other Thanksgiving story that’s worth mentioning is Tobias Turkey. For those of you who don’t know, this is a story about a turkey who is determined to be the best turkey on the farm. So he tries everything to make himself be the best turkey on the farm. It’s actually pretty clever when you read it. Better yet, if you’re in NY in November you can go to the Shadow Box Theater and watch a puppet show about it. I remember seeing it when I was ten and enjoying it. Haven’t touched the book in decades but for some strange reason it came back to me a few days ago.

So with that, there needs to be more Thanksgiving stories that are clever and not have to do with the first Thanksgiving. What we have how is pretty mediocre and that needs to stop. Beyond that, happy Thanksgiving all. Make sure you spend it with family and not out buying useless crap you can get for the same price in February.


Leave a comment

Filed under Let's Talk About...